The book is about Charlie Decker, a student who kills his teacher in school and takes several of his classmates as hostages. The reader gets to spend a lot of time in Charlies's head, exploring his thoughts and inner turmoil.
I can't say I found Charlie's character to be very well-developed and I had a hard time explaining his actions and understanding his "reasoning" for them. This is one of the main reasons I couldn't get into the story. I found it a bit annoying that King attempts to depict him as the victim in this situation, not only by the first-person narration that he has picked but also by the stance he has chosen to adopt for him. Charlie is by no means a hero or a victim of his circumstances, he is an outcast full of unaddressed issues, although he's not always portrayed that way.
Then we have Charlie's classmates, who although may seem more normal, aren't without issues themselves. I found none of them compelling, relatable or likable. And since most of the novel is spent exploring the dynamics/backgrounds of these people, not being able to connect with them or be invested in them really hinders the story.
Honestly, for most of it, I was just bored. Although I'm usually all about character-driven stories, I just could not - and did not want to - sympathize, connect with, or appreciate the protagonist. The narrative is written in a way that's supposed to make the reader sympathize with him while he's clearly the problematic one. And while he kind of may be the victim of a traumatic past, he certainly is the perpetrator in this case and there is no way his actions could be justified or understood.
I guess that the theme of the story was supposed to be something along the lines that we all become what our backgrounds make us. If that was the case, I don't think it was very well served and I think it could have been executed much better.
"Rage" was not my cup of tea. It felt problematic and it made me feel bored. It's a quick read, the book is short, but despite its short length, it often has a hard time remaining focused. It's definitely not one of King's finest moments, despite his otherwise undeniable talent. I rated it 1* out of 5*. However, it was still interesting to get to know one of King's earlier works and even if I didn't love it, I'm still glad I got to read it.
Feel free to share your opinions in the comments below, I'd love to hear them. Once more, thank you for reading!
No comments:
Post a Comment