"The Metamorphosis" by Franz Kafka || A Book Review

If you were searching for a book that will make you think and give you food for thought, then "The Metamorphosis" is what you're looking for. I can clearly see why this book has been so widely talked about and why there have been so many different interpretations and correlations put into this story over the years.

Gregor Samsa, the main character of the book, awakes from a bad dream, into a mad nightmare, as he has overnight transformed into a big, hideous bug. His first thought upon finding out he's a beetle is how he's going to miss work and this tells you, I think, all you need to know about him. His job and contribution to his family have become the very essence of his character, they have come to defy him to the point where he can't even imagine himself outside of it, even if the whole world turned upside down.

Throughout the story, he realizes just how insignificant he is - leading the reader to also realize how insignificant we all, ultimately, are in the greater scheme of things. As a bug, he's no longer the backbone of his family, its most important member, instead, he has been swept aside, forgotten, and has now become a burden, while the family adapts, finds new means of survival and life continues as it always must.

"The Metamorphosis" is also a metaphor that demonstrates how little, insignificant, and ugly society can make you feel if you are different, and how horribly it will treat you if you don't fit in - not much differently than Gregor's family makes him feel once he doesn't fit anymore. Gregor's family works as a metaphor for the society and this book manages to paint a brutal depiction of them, especially in their state of tremendous turmoil. The truths within the story are all the more obvious by the absurdist, dark humor in Kafka's work, which derives from his self-sarcasm.

The narration is slow and repetitive but not in a negative way. This style of narration perfectly fits the story, as it outlines the story's nature and highlights the surreal dimension of Gregor's condition and his mental state as well. This story probably couldn't have been told any other way. The immobility to which he has been forced through his condition nails us - and the narration - to the ground, making it as slow and excruciating as his first steps in his new condition as a bug. The language is simple and accessible, with a good touch of irony.

The ending is pretty sad. It leaves you with no answers or explanations, it instead lets you draw your own conclusions and lessons from the story. Gregor’s family, and Gregor, cannot stop what is happening. They just have to go on with it and hope to make it through to the other side. Forced into a situation we cannot control, we perish. Such is life.

The "Metamorphosis" is surreal, inexplicable, bewildering, and unusual, yet utterly compelling. It opens several doors of reflection on different themes such as dependence, work, a ruthless world, social relationships, family, powerlessness the futility of human existence, and the meaning of life. This isn’t a story that will ever leave the reader. It’s haunting and told with realistic mundanity. 

"Ikigai" || Book Review

 

I saw this book at a bookstore and loved the cover. It stayed on my mind for a while and when the book got in my hands and I read the synopsis, I decided to read it. This book is a "collection" of advice on how to live a better, longer life mostly based on Japanese culture and Asian practices.

The book does offer some insight and a different point of view on life than what we in the West have been used to. The ideas are mostly mildly interesting but nothing new or grand either. Some of the advice is pretty basic and shared amongst many people worldwide: sleep well, eat well, exercise moderately... Nothing new there... The parts that do have something to offer are the ones talking about less practical, more abstract concepts, like how to approach problems in life, how a sense of community contributes to a better life,

Something that bothered me about the book is that the writer keeps contradicting himself. He will make a statement at the beginning and try to prove it and a few pages later he will make another statement that directly opposes the first one. I can't tell if he realizes he did it and just happens to carry a few contradicting opinions, or if he hadn't realized. 

He also tends to repeat the same ideas - as if to fill pages - but doesn't really put an effort into a more detailed, more in-depth, and more nuanced discussion.

Overall, there are some good bits in the book but it was mostly boring. It offers quick overviews of various concepts but doesn't delve deep into any one topic. It felt like the intent was right but the execution was lost midway. The book may be a good choice for someone new to the self-help genre, but it wouldn't be of much value to someone who has read other similar books before.

I rated this book 2/5* as it was nothing great, but not terrible either. 

I hope you found my review useful and that you have enjoyed the post. I'd love to read your opinions of the book if you've read it and also any recommendations you may have!

"Oliver Twist" by Charles Dickens || Book Review

"Oliver Twist" is one of these books that I've wanted to read for a long time, but never got around to it. I'm very happy I finally read it and even more excited to write a review about it!

The writing is simple, clear, and easy to understand, yet well-structured and concise. It makes sense why it would be a recommended read for school for young students and English learners. The plot, while fairly simple, is tight and solid. The plot points are tied seamlessly with strong narration and beautiful prose, thus making the story even more compelling. The language is easy to understand and beautiful as well.

The characters are well-written, distinct, and memorable. You can clearly see the symbolism and connections between characters and the themes/morals they represent. Oliver represents kindness, pureness, and hope. In short, he represents everything good and positive, trying to survive in this dark and negative world, full of bad and negative people trying to take you down and full of hard circumstances. 

However, as likable and good as Oliver's character was throughout the story, my favorite character has to be Nancy. Nancy starts in a bad place in the story, life has brought her there to survive and she has become cruel herself. She manages, however, to see the error in her ways, to understand what's right, and even to stand up against all evil forces. I loved her character development, I loved how she changed the course of events with her actions/decisions and I was really sad about her ending. To me, she represents all the people who - even in the hardest, darkest of circumstances - make the choice to stand up and make a difference.

The villains were all really disgusting, each one of them representing different bad qualities and all of them equally well-portrayed.

There's some mystery in the story regarding Oliver's real identity and it's interesting how it slowly unravels with each page. The outcome of the story is not the most unpredictable or surprising but it does have quite a bit of suspense and holds your interest well.

I guess, the main message of the story is that goodness, kindness, and mercy can survive through every kind of hardship and will, in the end, prevail. Life is unfair and cruel but Oliver stays strong, grows out of humiliation and abuse, and holds on to his virtues. 

I rated this book 4/5*. It's not hard to see why this book is so widely loved and recommended. It's one of these books that are not only worth your time and attention but one of the books that one ought to read within their lifetime... 

"Rage", by Richard Bachman (Stephen King) || Book Review

"Rage" is one of the first of King's novels that was published under the pseudonym Richard Bachman. The book is apparently not available anymore, as Stephen King decided to take it off the market due to its subject and the fear of the implications it might have caused. And while this is a legit reason, I can't help but wonder if the book's poor quality was also considered in this decision. If I had one phrase to sum up how I feel about this book it would be "it's just not very good".

The book is about Charlie Decker, a student who kills his teacher in school and takes several of his classmates as hostages. The reader gets to spend a lot of time in Charlies's head, exploring his thoughts and inner turmoil. 

I can't say I found Charlie's character to be very well-developed and I had a hard time explaining his actions and understanding his "reasoning" for them. This is one of the main reasons I couldn't get into the story. I found it a bit annoying that King attempts to depict him as the victim in this situation, not only by the first-person narration that he has picked but also by the stance he has chosen to adopt for him. Charlie is by no means a hero or a victim of his circumstances, he is an outcast full of unaddressed issues, although he's not always portrayed that way. 

Then we have Charlie's classmates, who although may seem more normal, aren't without issues themselves. I found none of them compelling, relatable or likable. And since most of the novel is spent exploring the dynamics/backgrounds of these people, not being able to connect with them or be invested in them really hinders the story.

Honestly, for most of it, I was just bored. Although I'm usually all about character-driven stories, I just could not - and did not want to - sympathize, connect with, or appreciate the protagonist. The narrative is written in a way that's supposed to make the reader sympathize with him while he's clearly the problematic one. And while he kind of may be the victim of a traumatic past, he certainly is the perpetrator in this case and there is no way his actions could be justified or understood.

I guess that the theme of the story was supposed to be something along the lines that we all become what our backgrounds make us. If that was the case, I don't think it was very well served and I think it could have been executed much better.

"Rage" was not my cup of tea. It felt problematic and it made me feel bored. It's a quick read, the book is short, but despite its short length, it often has a hard time remaining focused. It's definitely not one of King's finest moments, despite his otherwise undeniable talent. I rated it 1* out of 5*. However, it was still interesting to get to know one of King's earlier works and even if I didn't love it, I'm still glad I got to read it.

Feel free to share your opinions in the comments below, I'd love to hear them. Once more, thank you for reading!

The Art Of War by Sun Tzu || A Book Review

I read this a while ago and it was one of the books that are completely out of my comfort zone. When it comes to books I don't usually go for, I tend to pick the audiobook, as a great chance to get more familiar with audiobooks as a medium and with different and unfamiliar subjects as well. I listened to the audiobook in a few hours and the narrator was excellent, but I have to admit that I felt weird reading it, however, in the end, it was still an interesting experience.  

This book is a guide on war, but it could as well be called "The Art of Strategy". What is interesting about it, is that despite it being a guide on war, the advice given could easily be applied to multiple other occasions outside of war or battle. It manages to give simple and still coherent today advice on dealing with conflict, and complicated, messy situations.

Another interesting fact about it is that even though it was written in a particular era, most of the rules are still of use and can apply to the modern-day world and situations. In my opinion, this gives it a sense of timelessness. I can't tell if the other intended to give this timelessness to it, or if it just occurred, but it's definitely there.

The writing style wasn't great, as I felt it was repetitive and a bit tedious at times, but the book is not so much about the wiring itself, as it's for the concepts analyzed and these concepts are worth the read. The book is short but it could have been shorter and more concise, thus helping with the repetidness as well. 

Concluding, this is a simple and accessible book that's unique and memorable in its own way. It was an interesting experience reading it and I'm glad to have read it, and even though I recognize its value, I couldn't rate it more than 2* out of 5*. I didn't love it, but it was a good read and I believe that even if you feel hesitant, you should still give it a chance.

My 2024 Reading Goals

 

2023 was not my most productive reading year, but it was nevertheless quite enjoyable. The time has come now for me to set my reading goals for 2024 in hopes that I will this time make it. I will try my best to reach these small goals and even more to enjoy this reading year.

1. Read at least 20 books
   
   
2. Read at least 2 classics
   
   
3. Listen to at least 2 audiobooks
   
   
4. Read at least 2 non-fiction books
   
   
5. Read at least 2 Stephen King books
   
   
6. Keep reviewing the books I read

My goals are exactly the same as last year, so I don't have anything extra to say about them. The logic behind each one of them is the same as previous years and since last year I didn't make it, I don't feel like changing any of them. 

If anything, my goal is to be more consistent with my reading, writing and blogging in general and I really hope that I'll make it.

Please, feel free to share your goals down below. I'd love to read your answers.